|
Jamaa'ah at-Tableegh:
Teachings of Shirk in the book
-"Fadhaa.il A'maal" - Part
3
Tableeghi Jamaat: Teachings of
Shirk
in the Book -"Fadhaa.il
A'maal" (popularly referred to
as - " Fazail Amal")
Part 3: Readings in
"Fadhaa.il Hajj" (virtues of
hajj)
Editors Introduction
All praise is due to Allaah. We
praise Him, seek His help and forgiveness.
And we seek refuge in Allaah the Most High
from the evils of our own selves and from
our bad deeds. Whomsoever Allaah guides
none can misguide him and whomsoever Allaah
misguides there is none to guide such an
individual. I bear witness that there is no
true god worthy of being worshipped except
Allaah alone, without partner or associate.
I further bear witness that Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) is His slave and Messenger. May
Allaah the Exalted bestow his peace and
blessings on the final messenger Muhammad,
upon his family, his noble companions and
all those who follow them.
To Proceed:
That the most truthful speech is
the Qur'aan, the word of Allaah and the
best of guidance is that of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam). And the worst of affairs in
this religion of ours are the innovations
and every innovation is a bid`ah
and every bid`ah
is misguidance and every misguidance is in
the hell fire.
Alhamdulillah, this is the third
paper in the series of exposing the
teachings of Shirk
and bid`ah
in the book Fadha'il 'A'maal
(also known as Tableeghi Nisaab). I would
like to remind my brothers and sisters that
the intent of these papers is not to curse
anyone.The author of Fadhaíl
A'maal is dead and his affair is with
Allaah the Mighty and Majestic. The real
intent of this research is to warn all
Muslims of the deviations in 'Aqeedah,
Ibaadah, Manhaj that have crept into the Ummah
of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) through fabricated narrations
and false stories of auliya which
unfortunately forms nearly 80% of
Fadha'il 'A'maal. It is to warn
and call the Muslims at the same time to
leave bigoted partisanship, to correct
their 'Aqeedah and
to hold on to the clear path that the
Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) left us upon. Anything else is
total destruction in this world and in the
hereafter.
Verily Allaah the Most High has
said in the Qur.aan (meaning of
which):
{And
whoever contradicts and opposes the
Messenger (Muhammad) after the right path
has been shown clearly to him, and follows
other than the believers' way. We shall
keep him in the path he has chosen, and
burn him in Hell - what an evil
destination}, [Soorah
An-Nisa., Aayah
115]
In this paper we will concentrate
of Fadha'il Hajj (virtues of Hajj).
This is the final chapter in Volume II of
Fadha'il 'A'maal. It also
contains the most awful and horrendous
teachings of major shirk.
Any reader will be shocked to read the
narrations that the author, Muhammad
Zakaria Kandalvi has brought out which are
nothing but plain Hinduism, Qadianism and
paganism and we seek refuge in Allaah the
Most High. The great Shaikh al Hadith, the
so called knower of Allaah and pivot of the
world goes at length on explaining the
virtues of sticking to the Sunnah
but he himself failed to practice to what
he preached!
And unfortunately Kandalvi has
combined all the major deviations that have
struck this Ummah
in his book. From distorting the meanings
of the attributes of Allaah to preaching
major shirk
and innovations in its worst forms,
Fadha'il 'A'maal without doubt
is the most false, fabricated and "shirk
story book" of our times.
Why did not Zakaria Kandalvi stop
where our Pious
Predecessors stopped? Why were the
narrations not sufficient for him when they
were sufficient for the first generation?
Why did not the "Shaikh al-Hadith of
Deobandh" refer to the authemtic
narrations in Bukhaaree,
Muslim and other
collections of ahadith? Why in the name of
love and Ibaadah the tenets of Sufism and
Hinduism are being propagated? Why is the
'Aqeedah of
the Rafidee Sh'ia being smuggled under
the guise of Sunnah? And why is
shirk
taught and Tawheed suppressed? We seek an
answer from our brothers who are involved
in Jamaa'at ut-Tableegh. "Shaikh
al-Hadith" Kandalvi Sahib himself
says, "…it is important to note
that whenever I quoted a 'hadit'
without mentioning the name of the book, it
should be deemed to have been taken from
one of the five books, viz.,
'Al-Mishkat', …'Sharah
Ihya al-Ulum'
Ihya ulum ad-Deen? He could not
find a better collection? Why are not Saheeh
al-Bukhaaree, Saheeh Muslim or any
other sound collection of narrations were
chose by the Muhaddith?
It will be beneficial to know what
the scholars have said about this book over
the years:
AT-TURTOOSHEE (d.520H)
He said in writing to 'Abdullaah
Ibnul-Mudhaffar about al-Ghazzaalee:
"When he
wrote his book, he called it Ihyaa
'Uloomud-Deen, and talked about the
sciences of the states of things and ways
of the Soofees in it, but he was neither
well acquainted with them nor well-informed
about them, so he fell headlong, and thus
did not fall either among the scholars of
the Muslims or within the conditions of the
Soofee ascetics.
He filled
his book with lies upon the Messenger of
Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam), and I do not know of any book
upon the surface of the earth which
attributes more lies to the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) than this one! He molded it
with the opinions of the philosophers and
concepts held in the Rasaa'il
Ikhwaanis-Suffaa. They (the
Ikhwaanus-Suffaa) are a people who regard
Prophethood as a level that can be
acquired, and the Prophet is in their view
no more than a noble person with excellent
character who avoided what is ignoble and
took hold of his own soul until he had it
under control so that no desire overcame
it, nor bad manners overtook it, then he
took control of nature with those
manners."
AL-MAAZAREE (d.536H)
Al-Haafidh adh-Dhahabee says in Siyar
A'laamun-Nubalaa (19/340) ...and Imaam
Muhammad Ibn 'Alee al-Maazaree
as-Saqilee speaks about al-Ihyaa in a way
that shows his prominence as an lmaam. He
says:
'There have
been repeated requests to know our position
regarding the book called Ihyaa 'Uloom
ud-Deen and I said that the opinions of
people differ about it. A group seeks to
publicise it and stick blindly to that, a
group warns the people against it and
causes them to flee from it, and a group
who burn it.
The people of the East have also
written to me, asking about it, and I have
not previously read except parts of it. So
if Allaah extends my life, I shall spend
time upon it and remove the confusion the
peoples hearts. Know that I have seen the
students of it, and all of them relate to
me a part of its condition which take the
place of seeing with ones own eyes, so I
will briefly mention his condition and that
of his book, and some of the positions of
the people of Tawheed and of the Soofees,
and the people of allusions and philosophy,
since his book wavers between all of
those!"
AL-QAADEE 'IYAAD (d.544H)
He said:
"And Shaykh
Aboo Haamid (al-Ghazzaalee) possesses
-repugnant information and in producing
shocking works he went beyond bounds in the
way of Soofism, and devoted himself to
supporting them, and became a caller to
that, and wrote well-known books on that
(He refers to al-Ihyaa as is shown by what
comes after).
He was reproached for parts of that
and the minds of the Ummah
came to have a low opinion of him. Allaah
knows that which is hidden about him, and
here in the West the order of the Sultaan
(ruler) and the ruling of the scholars is
that it should be burnt and kept away from,
so that was done..."
IBN AL-JAWZEE (d. 597H)
He says in al-Muntazim (9/169-170):
"He began to
write the book al-Ihyaa in al-Quds and
finished it in Damascus, however, he wrote
it upon the way of the Soofis and did away
with the rules of Fiqh in it. For example,
regarding effacing of honour and fighting
the self, he mentions that a man wished to
efface his own honour, so he entered a
public bath and put on someone else's
clothes, then he put his own clothes on top
of them and went out walking slowly so that
the people could catch him. So they took
them back from him and called him 'The
Thief of the Public
Baths'.
Mentioning such things as this for
followers to learn from is disgusting
because it is judged so according to Fiqh.
When there is a guardian for public baths
and a person steals, his hand is cut off,
and it is not permissible for a Muslim to
offer an action for which they would be
sinful if they did it!
He mentions that a man bought some
meat and found that his soul felt shy to
carry it to his house, so he tied it round
his neck and walked to his house. This is
also totally repugnant and there are many
similar things for which this is not the
place.
I have gathered together the
mistakes of the book and called it "A
Notification to the Living Regarding the
Errors of al-Ihyaa", and I have
pointed some of them out in my book
Talbees-Iblees!
(Also) what he mentions in the
book of marriage that 'Aa'ishah
said to the Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam), "You are the one who
claims that you are the Messenger of
Allaah!"
That is impossible! Verily the
reason for his turning away from the
requirements of Fiqh in that which he
quotes is that he accompanied the Soofis
and regarded their condition to be the
goal, and he said, "Indeed I have
taken the way from Aboo 'Alee
al-Farmadhee and I followed what he
directed me to as regards daily worships
and continual dhikr (remembering Allaah)
until I passed those difficulties and
became burdened with heavy tasks, and I did
not attain that which I
sought."
And further, there are many, many
other scholars of Ahlus Sunnah who have
strongly criticized this books and its
likes. But Kandalvi takes from it
extensively. Is this not a
deviation?
And we call all the Muslims to
Islaam. Not the Islaam of a group or any
Jamah' or to any personality. But we
call you to Islaam where the Messenger of
Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) left us. Where the night is
like its day. He left us on the straight
path but shiataan took us to paths on the
left and the right. The shayateen amongst
the men and jinn took the Muslims to those
crooked path at the head is a bigger devil
calling to the fire.
From 'Abdullaah Ibn
Mas'ood (radiyallaahu 'anhu) who
said:
"The Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) drew a line for us, then he
said: "This is the Path of
Allaah." Then he drew lines from
it's right and it's left, then he
said:
((These
are scattered lines, upon each of them is a
devil calling to it)). Then he
read:
{And
verily this is My Straight Path, so follow
it and do not follow the other paths
because they will separate you from His
Path}, [Soorah
al-An'aam, Aayah
153]" [Related by Nisaa`ee (no. 184)
and Ahmad (1/435) and this wording is by
him. It is also related by ad-Daarimee
(1/67-68) and at-Tabaree in Jaami'ul
Bayaan (8/65), it was authenticated by
Shaykh Saleem al-Hilaalee in Basaa`ir
Dhush-Sharaf (p. 82).]
This is the worst disease that
today every Muslim has attached himself to
a party or a personality making Taqleed and
trading his intellect for no gain. The
agenda of the party is placed even above
the Sunnah
of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) and the word of the leader is
final. Anyone opposing it is expelled and
ostracized. How can we establish the
Sharee'ah of Allaah when we don't
even know it. All the groups hate
knowledge. They don't call to it and
neither do they instruct their followers to
seek it. Every group today claims to be
working to establish the law of Allaah on
earth but each group claims the other to be
Jaahil and misguided. How can, in the midst
of such multiple parties, groups and sects
achieve unity of the Muslims. What is the
solution to bringing us into one
brotherhood?
Allaah the All Wise has said in
the Qur.aan (meaning of which):
{And hold
fast altogether to the rope of Allaah and
do not be divided.And remember the favour
of Allaah upon you, in that you were once
enemies to one another, but He joined your
hearts together, so that by His Grace you
became brothers}, [Soorah
Aali-'Imraan, Aayah
103]
{Indeed
this Ummah
of yours is a
single Ummah
and I am your Lord,
so worship Me alone}, [Soorah
al -Anbiyaa., Aayah
92]
{And He
has united their (i.e. believers')
hearts. If you had spent all that is in the
earth, you could not have united their
hearts, but Allâh has united them.
Certainly He is All-Mighty,
All-Wise}, [Soorah
Anfal, Aayah
63]
And how is this joining of he
hearts to be achieved? What are the means
of achieveing this miracle that is possible
only with Allaah the Most High? By the
example of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam). And what is said about
Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam)?
{He it is
Who sent among the unlettered ones a
Messenger (Muhammad) from among themselves,
reciting to them His Verses, purifying them
(from the filth of disbelief and
polytheism), and teaching them the Book
(this Qur'ân, Islâmic laws
and Islâmic jurisprudence) and
Al-Hikmah (Sunnah: legal
ways, orders, acts of worship, etc. of
Prophet Muhammad). And verily, they had
been before in mainfest error},
[Soorah
Jumu'ah, Aayah
2]
We can only bring the Muslims
together through Tasfiya wa Tarbiya
(purification and cultivation) If the
Sharee'ah of Allaah can join a hundred
hardened tribes 1400 hundred years ago and
make them into one brotherhood, why
can't the same happen today with
hundreds of parties? But this education
involves exposing the innovators; their
figureheads and their books. It is to warn
all Muslims of their deviations so that
they save themselves and their families
from the evil and return to the
Jamaa'ah. The Jamaa'ah that the
Sahaba were upon and which today is best
embodied by those who are on the Manhaj of
the Pious Predecessors and all praise be to
Allaah the one worthy of praise.
Following the principles of
Tasfiya wa Tarbiya, this is a continuing
effort inshAllaah to expose the books of
Jamaa'at ut-Tableegh headed by
Fadha'il 'A'maal. And I hope
that it becomes a source of guidance for
any Muslim who reads it. And in the
footsteps on the noble Imaam, teacher,
defender of the Sunnah, al
Barbaharee (d.329H) I use his noble
statement that the purpose of writing of
these papers is "…perhaps Allaah
will bring a confused person out of his
confusion, or an innovator out of his
innovation, or a misguided one out of his
misguidance and he may be saved through
it."
Reading through Fadha'il Hajj,
it is difficult to deicde where to start
from? From the Taweel of the Sifat of
Allaah? Or open teachings of grave worship?
The "above the Prophet" status of
the auliya? Lies on the Sahaba? Or
worshipping the auliya themselves? But as
we read we will have some uniformity
inshAllaah in the refutations and not an
unorganized mess.
Before we actually dive into
Fahdail Amaal let us take heed from the
following pure narrations:
Abu Hurayrah (radhi-yallaahu
'anhu) narrates that the Messenger
of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) said:
((It is
sufficient to render a man a liar that he
narrates everything he hears)),
(Reported by Muslim)
And he also narrated from
Allaah's Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam):
((There
will come at the end of time, Dajjaals,
Liars, who will come to you with ahaadeeth
that neither yourselves nor your
forefathers will have heard of. So beware
and beware of them, lest they cause you to
go astray and be put to trial)),
[Saheeh Muslim and Musnad
Ahmad, it is Saheeh]
The Open Sanctioning of Grave
Worship in Fahda'il
'A'maal.
Zakaria Kandalvi has presented a
cocktail of 'Aqeedah in
Fadha'il Hajj. He borrowed from the
Ashaira shifting to Raafidah then morphing
to Soofiya with traces of Qadiyyaniyah and
finally ending with Hinduism! And
protecting is sought with Allaah from all
these faces of Kufr.
Kandalvi starts with making Taweel of the
attribute of the descending of Allaah in
the manner of the Ash'arees.
He writes on page 15, Fadha'il
Hajj, Volume II:
"The issue of Allaah being
near or descending or any such type of
narrations that are mentioned its knowledge
is only with Allaah; He is always near but
the apparent meaning that the majority of
the scholars have taken is that it is the
special mercy of Allaah"
Allaahu Mus'ta'aan! Which
scholar from Ahlus Sunnah and upon the
Manhaj of the Pious Predecessors said this?
This is only with the conformity with the
wretched 'Asha'irah that they make
figurative interpolations of what they
refuse to understand of the Sifat of Allaah
the Most High and Blessed. They do not
stick to the basic principles regarding the
attributes of Allaah and argue about what
is forbidden. And why has not the
statements of the Pious Predecessors quoted
on the issue of the descent of Allaah the
Mighty and Majestic? Are they lost in
history or did Kandalvi chose not to quote
them, bringing out the 'Aqeedah of
the wretched Ash'arees?
Those who make ta'weel and
attribute meanings to the words of Allaah,
that they themselves have devised, then
they are lying upon Allaah, as they do not
know whether Allaah intended that meaning
they devised or not! And the way of the
Pious Predecessors was to accept the
attributes, with their meanings, but negate
their likeness to those of the
Creation.
Imaam Abul-Abbaas ibn Suraij known
as 'ash-Shaafi'ee the second'
and he was a contemporary of
Al-Ash'aree, said: "We do not
speak with Ta'weel (interpretation) of
the Mu'tazilah, the Ash'arees, the
Jahmiyyah, the apostates, the
anthropomorphists (Mujassimah and
Mushabbihah), the Karraamiyyah and those
who declare Allaah to be like His creation
(Mukayyifah - those asking about the
modality of His attributes). Rather we
accept them [the texts about Allaah's
attributes] without interpretation
(Ta'weel) and we believe in them
without declaring any likeness with the
creation (Tamtheel)." Ijtimaa
ul-Juyoosh il-Islaamiyyah (p.62)
It will be beneficial to know the
statements of our Pious Predecessors
regarding this matter their
consensus.
Al-Waleed Ibn Muslim (d.194H) -
rahimahullaah - said:
"I asked
Maalik, al-Awzaa'ee, Layth Ibn Sa'd
and Sufyaan ath-Thawree - rahimahumullaah -
concerning the reports related about the
Attributes, so they all said: Leave them as
they are, without asking
how." (Related by
al-Aajurree in ash-Sharee'ah (p. 314),
al-Bayhaqee in al-Asmaa' was-Sifaat (p.
453) and also in al-I'tiqaad (p. 118)
and the chain of narrators is
hasan.)
Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.241H) -
rahimahullaah - said:
"These
ahaadeeth should be left as they
are…We affirm them and we do not make
any similitude for them. This is what has
been agreed upon by the
Scholars." (Related by
Ibnul-Jawzee in Manaaqibul-Imaam Ahmad (p.
155-156))
Imaam at-Tirmidhee (d.279H) -
rahimahullaah - said:
"It has been
stated by more than one person from amongst
the People of Knowledge about such
ahaadeeth, that there is no tashbeeh
(resemblance) to the Attributes of Allaah,
and our Lord - the Blessed, the Most High -
descends to the lowest heavens every night.
So they say: Affirm these narrations, have
faith (eemaan) in them, do not deny them,
nor ask how. The likes of this has been
narrated from Maalik Ibn Anas, Sufyaan
ath-Thawree, Ibn 'Uyaynah and
'Abdullaah Ibnul-Mubaarak, who all said
about such ahaadeeth, ''Leave them
as they are, without asking how.''
Such is the statement of the People of
Knowledge from Ahlus-Sunnah
wal-Jamaa'ah. However, the Jahmiyyah
oppose these narrations and say: This is
tashbeeh! However, Allaah - the Most High -
has mentioned in various places in His
Book, the Attributes of al-Yad (Hand),
as-Sama' (Hearing) and al-Basr (Sight)
- but the Jahmiyyah make ta'weel of
these aayaat, explaining them in a way,
other than how it is explained by the
People of Knowledge. They say: Indeed,
Allaah did not create Aadam with His own
Hand - they say that 'Hand' means
that Power of Allaah."
Sunanut-Tirmidhee (3/24)
And the narrations are
numerous.
Coming back to our topic of grave
worship, Kandalvi stated 80 years ago in
very explicit words the virtues and benefit
of grave worship of grave worship. Not just
the grave of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) but the grave of any wali. But
the sanctioning required the prerequisite
of labeling great virtue and honour on the
graves of the auliya in general Prophet in
particular. So the fabrication machines of
Deobandh go into overtime and come out with
the following:
Fadha'il Hajj, Page 138:
"When you see the green dome
then it should be with awe and reverance
and you should take care of the honour of
the Huzoor and reflect that in that pure
dome is he who is the best of creation,
leader of the Prophets and virtuous the
angels. The place of the holy grave is
superior than any other place and that
place which touches the holy body of the
Huzoor is superior to the Ka'bah,
superior to the Arsh, superior to the Kursi
in fact superior than everything in the
heavens and earth."
Did Kandalvi leave anything? In
his extreme and false exaggeration of the
grave of the Prophet he did not even spare
the Arsh and Kursi of Allaah the Most High.
Indeed the Allaah and his Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) are free from what they
say.
Now that Kandalvi established the
merit of the grave the only thing that
remained was to worship there and make
pilgrimage to the grave of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam). But the poor and ignorant mass
of the Subcontinent and elsewhere would not
waste their life savings on a lifeless
prophet. Nay, when the Ummah
of Muhammad leave the narrations stupidity
and humiliation is placed upon them. The
people want a Prophet who is alive. So
enter the Shaikh al Hadith Kandalvi and his
books!
On page 144, Fadha'il
Hajj:
"Allamah Qastalaani writes in
Muwahib that you should present yourself to
the Prophet proper conduct such that was
due to him in his lifetime because the
Prophet is alive in His grave"
What kind of heresy is this? The
Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) alive in his grave? Are we to
believe Kandalvi and conclude that the
Sahaba of the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) buried him alive? Was the
historic speech of Abu Bakr (radhi-yallaahu
'anhu) mere jest? When he, Abu Bakr
(may Allaah be pleased with be) said that
whoever worships Muhammad then Muhammad is
dead was a figure of speech and mockery?
And Kandalvi wants us to believe in an 'aqeedah
diametrically opposite to that of the Noble
Sahaba?
Allaah the Mighty and Majestic
said in the Qur'aan (meaning of
which):
{And we
granted not to any human being immortality
before you (O Muhammad), then if you die
would they live forever? Everyone is going
to taste death, and We shall make a trial
of you with evil and with good. And to Us
you will be returned}, [Soorah
al-Anbiya., Aayaat
34-35]
And,
{Verily,
you (O Muhammad) will die, and verily, they
(too) will die}, [Soorah
Az-Zumar., Aayah
30]
The Prophets are alive in their
graves but this is the life of the Barzakh
that we do not know about. The hands of the
Prophets do not come out of their graves,
they cannot hear us, they cannot rescues us
from harm or any other nonsense that
Fadha'il 'A'maal records in
this regard.
But this is not the end to open
preaching of grave worship. Furthermore, a
complete manual is presented in explicit
detail on how to present yourself to the
grave of a "wali."
On page 141, Fadha'il
'A'maal, Fadha'il Hajj, Volume
II:
"When you visit anyone's
grave, you should proceed from the
direction of the feet because if Allaah has
given the dead the power of Kashf then it
is easy for him to see you because when the
dead turns to his right in his grave then
his sight falls towards your feet. And when
anyone approaches the grave from the head
side of the dead then the dead has trouble
and difficulty in seing you."
Astaghfirullah! What kind of 'aqeedah is
this? If we are to believe in Kandalvi,
then would it be permissible to bury a wali
alive? The only example of burying alive we
know is that of the Arabs at the time of
Ignorance. And today this practice is still
found alive in Fadha'il
'A'maal. And how many brothers who
are in Jamaa'at ut-Tableegh have buried
their loved ones alive?
And for that matter, is Kandalvi
alive in his grave?
There is not a single authentic
narration found in any reliable books that
state of any wali being alive in his grave
and looking at the visitors of his tomb.
And Kandalvi, who was given very lofty
title such as "Knower of Allaah",
"Pivot of the world" and
"Shaikh al-Hadith" did not even
know the authenticity of such incidents or
was it that he did not care? Another
question of the Tableeghi
Jamaa'at.
So far what Kandalvi has sought to
prove is the high merit and value of
visiting graves and that the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) and the auliya are alive in
their graves and they see and listen to the
visitor. The objectives of the school of
Deobandh and Kandalvi will not be complete
up until they cheat the unsuspecting Ummah
into grave worship completely. And this
would require worshipping and supplicating
at graves. Since the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) and the noble Pious
Predecessors have always opposed this
heresy, there was no option left but to
lie. And lie they did. They lied on the
Sahaba and the Messenger and ridiculed them
to satisfy their lust for shirk
and Allaah's curse be upon the
liars.
So Kandalvi fabricates on page
176-177, Fadha'il Hajj:
"Hadhrat Ayesha said that
when my father Hadhrat Abu Bakr was ill he
willed that after his death his body should
be taken to the grave of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) and should be said that here is
Abu Bakr and he wishes to be buried next to
you. If you receive permission from there
then bury me there and if not then bury me
in Baqee'. Therefore, after the death
of Abu Bakr and according to his will his
funeral procession was taken towards the
grave of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa
sallam) and permission was sought. Then
we heard a voice from inside and there was
no speaker in sight. The voice said, Send
him in with honour and dignity.
"Hadhrat Ali said that when
the time of death approached Hadhrat Abu
Bakr he called me to his side and said,
'Wash me with the hands with which you
washed the Prophet and apply on me perfume
and take me to his room and ask for his
permission. If upon asking his permission
the doors of the room open then bury me
there and if not then bury me in the common
graveyard of the Muslims.'"
"Hadhrat Ali said that after
the preparations of the funeral I was the
first one to step forward and ask the
Prophet that Abu Bakr wants your permission
to be buried here. I then saw that the
doors of the room where the Prophet is
buried flung open and a voice said,
"Send the friend to the
friend.""
Let all Muslims know that the
above is a lie and is not found in any
authentic collections of ahadeeth. Rather,
such enormous lies can only come from
Tableeghi Jamaa'at who were rightfully
called the Soofis of the era by the
Muhaddith al-Albaanee (d.1420H).
Kandalvi has not even spared the most
noblest of the Sahaba and ascribed
wholesale shirk
to them. He wants the Muslims to believe
that even the companions held the | 
